Follow-up Plan for Learning RTM Results
Even semester 2022/2023
No. | Source | Findings | Root of the Problem | Follow-up | Feedback Form | RTM Document | Status |
1 | RPS has not been validated by the team in the science clump | Change of old format RPS to OBE RPS | RPS is validated and signed by the Science clump team | Fulfilled | |||
2 | RPS has not been authorized by Koorprodi | Change of old format RPS to OBE RPS | RPS signed by Head of Study Program | Fulfilled | |||
3 | Lecturers have not yet assessed student assignments | The assignment has not been corrected | Lecturer gives assignment assessment | Fulfilled | |||
4 | Lecturers have not returned graded assignments to students | The assignment has not been corrected | The lecturer returns the assignment and is proven by the Minutes of Return of Assignment | Fulfilled | |||
5 | Lecturers have not yet compiled the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS | Lecturers do not understand how to compile an assessment rubric | Lecturers Develop Rubrics for Midterm and Final Exams | Fulfilled | |||
6 | UTS score results have not been announced Back to students | UTS has not yet been corrected | Lecturer returns the UTS and is evidenced by the Minutes of Return of Assignment | Fulfilled | |||
7 | Lecturers have not uploaded teaching materials and/or supporting media | lack of lecturer discipline | Lecturers upload teaching materials on online media | Fulfilled | |||
8 | OBE RPS has not been uploaded in SIAKADU | obe format RPS preparation has not been completed | Lecturer uploads OBE RPS | Fulfilled | |||
9 | RPS does not yet contain information about the latest teaching materials (recommended maximum of the last 10 years) and from the results of research and community service. | Have not updated the learning resources in the RPS | Update reference on RPS | Fulfilled | |||
10 | Lecturers do not yet have teaching materials in the form of handouts, power points, diktats, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. | Have not developed the preparation of teaching materials | Lecturers make teaching materials according to course needs | Fulfilled | |||
11 | Lecturers have not provided an assessment of student participation (attendance, activeness and behavior) in learning. | Still in the process of small notes have not done the recording | Lecturer makes participation assessment | Fulfilled | |||
12 | The RPS for international classes is not yet bilingual. | not yet transcribed into English | RPS is bilingual | Fulfilled | |||
13 | The material does not match the RPS | substitute meetings and lecturers' indiscipline to comply with the RPS | Lecturers adjust lecture material to lecture meetings | Fulfilled |
Follow-up Plan for Learning RTM Results
Odd Semester 2023/2024
No. | Source | Findings | Root of the Problem | Follow-up | Feedback Form | RTM Document | Status |
1 | 1. Lecturers have not compiled a rubric for UTS assessment | RPS has been systemized with digital validation | Developing the rubric for the mid-term test | Fulfilled | |||
2 | 1. Lecturers have not determined the technical implementation of online shows chat / FGD (platform) 2. UTS score results have not been announced back to students | Not finished correcting | Using the WA group to announce lessons and Using the WA group to announce lessons. announced the results of the mid-term test | Fulfilled | |||
3 | UTS score results have not been announced back to students (no evidence yet) | Not finished correcting | Evaluate and socialize S2 Management lecturers to announce assessment results to students. | Fulfilled | |||
4 | Regular Class: 1. The RPS does not yet contain information about the latest teaching materials 2. Lecturers do not have teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides, training, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. 3. Lecturers have not assessed participation 4. UTS results have not been submitted to students International Class 1. Lecturers have not submitted learning contracts to students 2. Lecturers only use English 10 - 20% | Regular Class: 1. no RPS update has been done 2. Incomplete teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides, training, modules or textbooks written by lecturers. 3. Still in note form 4. Have not finished correcting the midterm exam International Class 1. lack of administrative order 2. Lecturers need to attend English language training | Regular Class: 1. Complete the RPS that contains information about the latest teaching materials 2. Lecturers complete teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides, training, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. 3. Grading participation 4. Submit test results to students International Class 1. Lecturer hands over the learning contract to students 2. Provide English language training to lecturers | Fulfilled | |||
5 | 1. In regular classes, the results of the mid-term test have not been handed back to students 2. In international classes lecturers use 15% English 3. In international classes, assignments are not yet organized in English. | 1. Not finished correcting 2. Lack of English language skills 3. Lecturers' inaccuracy in preparing assignments | 1. Close 2. Appeal letter to the lecturer 3. Close | Fulfilled | |||
6 | 1. Lecturers have not provided an assessment of the assignments given to students 2. Lecturers have not returned graded assignments to students 3. UTS score results have not been announced back to students 4. Lecturers have not compiled the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS 5. Assignments and exam questions have not been prepared in English 5. | 1. Not finished correcting 2. Not finished correcting 3. Not finished correcting 4. Lack of discipline of lecturers in writing UTS UAS questions 5. UPM's inaccuracy in validating assignments and questions 5. | 1. Grading the assignments given to students 2. Return graded assignments to students 3. Return UTS results to students 4. Lecturers compile the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS 5. Develop assignments and exam questions using English. | Fulfilled | |||
7 | | 1. In international classes lecturers use 50% English | Lack of lecturers' ability to speak English | 1. Lecturer uses 50% English 2. Make a monitoring and evaluation report | Fulfilled | ||
8 | Regular Class 1. RPS has not been designed and developed by lecturers independently/group according to the development of science and technology with Team-based Project and Case Method models. 2. RPS has not been validated by the science clump team 3. The developed RPS has been approved by the Koorprodi 4. RPS has contained learning outcomes according to KKNI which consists of knowledge, attitudes, general skills and special skills 5. Lecturers have not returned graded assignments to students. 6. Lecturers have not compiled a rubric for UTS assessment 7. UTS score results are announced back to students International Class 1. Assignments and exam questions have not been prepared in English. 2. UTS results have not been handed back to students 3. RPS is not yet bilingual 4. Teaching materials are not yet bilingual | Regular: 1. In the transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 2. clump team not yet authorized by the faculty 3. In the transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 4. In the transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 5. Not finished correcting 6. Lecturers' indiscipline in compiling questions 7. Not finished correcting International: 1. UPM's inaccuracy in validating questions 2. Not finished correcting 3. Lecturers' indiscipline in preparing the RPS 5. Lecturers' indiscipline in preparing teaching materials 5. | Regular Class 1. Develop RPS designed and developed by lecturers independently/group according to the development of science and technology with Team-based Project and Case Method models. 2. Validating the RPS by the science clump team 3. The developed RPS has been approved by the Koorprodi 4. Develop RPS that contains learning outcomes according to KKNI consisting of knowledge, attitudes, general skills and special skills. 5. Return graded assignments to students. 6. Develop a rubric for UTS assessment 7. Return the results of the midterm exam and announce them to the students. International Class 1. Develop assignments and exam questions using English. 2. Submit test results to students 3. Develop a bilingual SSP 4. Developing bilingual teaching materials | Fulfilled | |||
9 | 1. RPS has not been validated by science clusters 2. RPS does not yet contain teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years and from the results of research and PKM 3. RPS is not yet bilingual 4. Lecturers have not assessed participation 5. Lecturers have not provided an assessment of the assignment 6. Lecturers have not returned assignments to students 7. Lecturers have not developed an assessment rubric 8. UTS results have not been returned | 1. Cluster team not yet established 2. Has not updated the RPS 3. Lecturers' indiscipline in preparing the RPS 4. still in the form of notes 5. still being corrected 6. still being corrected 7. Lecturer indiscipline 8. still being corrected | 1. Validating the RPS by the science clump team 2. Revise the RPS that contains teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years and from the results of research and PKM 3. Develop a bilingual SSP 4. Grading participation 5. Grading the assignment 6. Returning assignments to students 7. Develop assessment rubric 8. Returning UTS Results | Fulfilled | |||
10 | Introduction to Microeconomics 1. Lecturer has not returned the assignment 2. Lecturers have not provided an assessment of the assignments given to students 3. Lecturers have not developed rubrics 4. Lecturer has not submitted UTS 5. Assignments and Exam Questions have not been prepared in English. | 1. Not finished correcting 2. Lecturers' indiscipline in conducting assessments 3. Lecturers' indiscipline in preparing questions that are complete with the assessment rubric 4. Not finished correcting 5. UPM's inaccuracy in validating questions 5. | Introduction to Microeconomics 1. returning the task 2. provide assessment of assignments given to students 3. develop rubric 4. submitting test results 5. Develop assignments and exam questions using English. 4. Make a report on the instrument and BA of the International Economics course and the instrument of the Introduction to Business course. | Fulfilled | |||
11 | 1. There is no UTS assessment rubric yet 2. Has not submitted proof of submission of UTS grades 3. Lecturers do not have teaching materials 4. Lecturers use English 10-15% 5. UTS results have not been submitted to students | 1. Lecturers' indiscipline in preparing questions that are complete with the assessment rubric 2. Not finished correcting 3. Lecturer relies too much on student presentation materials 4. Lack of lecturers' ability to speak English 5. Not finished correcting | 1. Develop a rubric for UTS assessment 2. submit proof of submission of UTS scores 3. Develop teaching materials 4. Use English 10-15% 5. Submit test results to students | Fulfilled |
Follow-up Plan for Research RTM Results
Even semester 2022/2023
No. | Source | Findings | Root of the Problem | Follow-up | Feedback Form | RTM Document | Status |
1 | 1. There has been no evaluation of the suitability of lecturers' and students' research with the roadmap 2. There is no evidence of using evaluation results to improve research relevance. 3. The study program has not had funding from research from national funding sources of at least 2 proposals and international funding sources of 1 proposal. | 1. Postgraduate to Faculty transition. | 1. Evaluate the suitability of lecturer and student research with the roadmap 2. Compile evidence of the use of evaluation results to improve research relevance 3. Apply for DRTPM research funding and collaboration 2024 | https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 | Fulfilled | ||
2 | 1. Never received collaborative research funding from the Faculty. | 1. Never received collaborative research funding from the Faculty. | Faculties set up funding next year (2024) | https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 | Fulfilled |
Follow-up Plan
PKM RTM Result
Even semester 2022/2023
No. | Source | Findings | Root of the Problem | Follow-up | Feedback Form | RTM Document | Status |
1 | 1. Less than 25% of PkM results are used in learning 2. The absence of learning activities from the results of PkM activities of lecturers, education personnel and students at least a number of lecturers in three years | 1. PkM results have not been used in learning. 2. PkM results have not been used in learning | 1. Incorporate pkm results in learning 2. Incorporate pkm results into the course RPS | https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 | Fulfilled | ||
2 | 1. PKM results have not been used in industrial learning in accordance with their fields 2. There is no document on the use of facilities and infrastructure for PkM activities in the study program. | 1. Education Personnel have never been involved in the PKM program 2. And waiting for the PKM results seminar to continue the haki process | 1 Incorporate the results of PKM into the course RPS. 2 Entering sarpras usage documents | https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 | Fulfilled |